Kepper Blue RSS

Normal view

There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdaywallabag — unread feed

China criticises idea it is in 'malicious competition' over AI

By: Koh Ewe
14 September 2026 at 14:56
estimated reading time: 4 min
Chinese President Xi Jinping waves as he arrives at the opening ceremony for the World AI Conference on July 17, 2026 in Shanghai, China.Image source, Getty Images
ByKoh Ewe

China has hit out against what it has called "threat narratives" over AI governance and warned against "engaging in confrontation and malicious competition".

It follows Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's calls for a slowdown in AI development - but in a way that prevents China from pulling ahead in the AI race.

Over the past week, industry insiders at the leading US artificial intelligence labs have been warning in extremely stark terms about the potential threat AI poses, with some saying it could wipe out humanity.

But US President Donald Trump has said that his priority is making sure the US develops the tech faster than China.

On Monday, China's foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun told reporters that "narratives of threat, confrontation, and malicious competition serve only to disrupt the process of global AI governance and are not in anyone's interest".

"All parties should work together to advance AI in a manner that is open, inclusive, beneficial to all, and oriented toward the good," he added.

His comments highlight the difficulties in getting an agreement between the world's two leading AI powers.

An agreement between the US and China to regulate AI development is "next to impossible", says Chang Jun Yan, an assistant professor with the military studies programme at Singapore's S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

"As part of each state's core national security interests, cooperation in taking things slower and more safely in relation to AI, is very, very unlikely."

Artificial intelligence now sits at the heart of the US-China rivalry as the world's two largest economies seek to gain an edge in advanced tech. Despite US export bans on critical chips, Chinese AI innovation has been expanding, driven by open-source technology and Beijing's backing.

Many experts believe the US is still ahead, and Chinese firms are trying to catch up as they struggle to raise the hundreds of billions of dollars that investors are ploughing into American AI.

But Beijing, including Chinese leader Xi Jinping himself, has also spoken about the risks posed by AI. China must "balance development and security", and introduce and improve relevant laws and ethical guidelines, and strengthen prevention of risks, to "safeguard the interests of the people and national security", state security minister Chen Yixin wrote on Sunday.

He warned of the dangers of "hostile forces" such as foreign intelligence using AI and called for international cooperation.

"There are strong signals that Washington and Beijing share an understanding of frontier risks," Kenton Thibaut, a senior resident China fellow at the Atlantic Council, wrote recently.

China has "technical reasons" to work with the US, she argues, because its developers would be able to see how their models are deployed outside China, and detect and understand vulnerabilities.

In July, China set up the World AI Cooperation Organisation, which aims to shape global AI governance. And speaking at the Brics summit in India on Sunday, Xi proposed creating a community for open-source AI.

All this comes as calls for AI regulation grow louder in the US, especially after a former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon said last week that "there is a strong chance that we could all die in the immediate future" if the current pace of development continued.

Since then top industry bosses, such as Dario Amodei, have called for a slowdown and more regulation.

"We need ways to ensure that alignment and safety techniques stay ahead of progress in model capabilities," Open AI's chief executive Sam Altman wrote on X on Monday, which was echoed by Microsoft boss Satya Nadella who said AI development "cannot be controlled by a handful of entities".

But US President Donald Trump downplayed the risks, saying that he wanted to keep the US's lead over China "because whoever wins AI, wins".

The competition is fierce.

The former Anthropic employee Coxon told the BBC that there needed to be "some sort of coordinated slowdown with China, if we're going to avoid a race at an international scale".

As Trump prepares to host Xi at the White House next week, the two sides are trying to include AI on the agenda, the South China Morning Post reports.

It is also likely to be part of the talks between US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice-Premier He Lifeng, who are trying to meet before next week's summit, the paper said. Vice-Premier He runs the agency that oversees the country's economic planning, including AI development.

While collaboration between the US and China is important, experts say the stakes are high for both countries.

"If China establishes a durable lead in frontier AI, this will not be viewed in Washington as losing a technology race," says Chasen Nevett, managing director at Hong Kong-based firm, Forani Investments.

"It will be viewed as losing part of the strategic infrastructure of the next industrial era."

Additional reporting by Osmond Chia

A human like robot figure with a line of robots behind him. The bottom half of the image is treated with a red glaze and the top is black and white

What are China’s biggest concerns about AI? A new article by Chen...

14 September 2026 at 14:38
estimated reading time: 2 minWhat are China’s biggest concerns about AI?

A new article by Chen Yixin, China’s Minister of State Security, in the latest issue of China Cybersecurity Magazine offers some revealing clues.

Chen identifies six major risks:
1. Regime security. Hostile forces and people with ulterior motives can use deepfakes, AI-generated text and images, and automated online accounts to cheaply and massively produce political rumors, spread harmful information, and incite social divisions—waging “public-opinion wars” and “cognitive warfare” against China and directly threatening its political, institutional, and ideological security.

2. Critical infrastructure. AI can enable countries and organizations to rapidly discover vulnerabilities, automatically chain together attack paths, and carry out sophisticated hacking operations, dramatically lowering the technical barriers and costs of cyberattacks against China’s critical information infrastructure.

3. Data leakage. Foreign intelligence agencies can use AI-powered web crawlers, data mining, and profiling to collect sensitive information, including critical national data, trade secrets, and citizens’ personal information. Chinese users who process sensitive information through foreign AI products or export data abroad could also cause large-scale data leaks.

4. Closed technological ecosystems. Countries with advantages in AI theory, model architecture, and computing power may invoke “national security” to impose technology controls, entity lists, monopolize technical standards, and build closed-source ecosystems, restricting other countries’ access to advanced technologies and fragmenting global AI supply chains.

5. Structural challenges to social governance. AI creates new uncertainties for social governance and public order. Algorithmic “black boxes” and data poisoning can amplify existing social biases; misuse of personal information can trigger crises of public trust; automated decision-making creates difficult questions of accountability; and the rapid development of AI is increasingly outpacing existing laws, ethics, and regulatory mechanisms.

6. A fundamental transformation of warfare. AI is pushing warfare into an era of “intelligentization.” Whoever can use algorithms to achieve more precise sensing, judgment, and targeting will gain the initiative on the battlefield. AI is moving from an auxiliary role to a central one in intelligence fusion, decision support, target identification, combat operations, and cognitive warfare.

And what is the solution?

Chen’s answer is revealing: strengthen “Party control over the internet” and “Party control over data,” and “transform the advantages of Party leadership into the effectiveness of AI governance.”

In other words, from the CCP’s perspective, the central question is not simply AI versus no AI. Nor is it even fundamentally a contest between the US and China.

It is a contest between the US and the CCP over who gets to control AI, data, information, and ultimately the future of society.

And whoever wins that contest will decide the future of humanity.

mp.weixin.qq.com/s/jsc97cKVYOcH…

Media image
❌
❌